Dear Victor,
The Bible speaks of humility as some kind of virtue. What exactly is humility? How do you know if someone is truly humble?
Terrence D. - Charleston, SC
Dear Terrence,
Truly humble people compare themselves only with Jesus Christ - knowing full well that He lives in them and that God's plan is to make them like Jesus. They realize their own sinfulness and their limitations, and their true identity in Christ. The humble will also recognize their gifts and strengths, and be willing to use them as God directs. Humility then, is just a realistic self-assessment and a commitment to serve.
Sunday, January 31, 2010
Saturday, January 30, 2010
Bi-Polar Disorder
Dear Victorious,
My sister supposedly has bi-polar disorder and has had it for a number of years. I've read up on it but frankly it seems like a bunch of psycho-junk. Is it a real disease - or an emotional cop-out?
Sidney T. - Beaver Falls, PA
Dear Sidney,
Based on your last phrase, I can guess what you think. So I wonder why you're asking me. Bi-polar is a legitimate diagnosis in the health care community. And I'm not qualified to debate that. However, I do suspect that its diagnosis could be more common than the actual malady is. I also believe that people can learn to overcome it or learn to compensate for it.
If you're asking about the spiritual dimension of a bi-polar diagnosis, I agree that there probably is one in many of the cases. It could be a case of demonic influence. It could be a case of untrained discernment. It could be a matter of immaturity. There are many possibilities. My core belief on the issue is that Jesus can overcome anything. I have yet to see someone acting out in their bi-polar disorder and submitted to Jesus Christ at the same time.
My sister supposedly has bi-polar disorder and has had it for a number of years. I've read up on it but frankly it seems like a bunch of psycho-junk. Is it a real disease - or an emotional cop-out?
Sidney T. - Beaver Falls, PA
Dear Sidney,
Based on your last phrase, I can guess what you think. So I wonder why you're asking me. Bi-polar is a legitimate diagnosis in the health care community. And I'm not qualified to debate that. However, I do suspect that its diagnosis could be more common than the actual malady is. I also believe that people can learn to overcome it or learn to compensate for it.
If you're asking about the spiritual dimension of a bi-polar diagnosis, I agree that there probably is one in many of the cases. It could be a case of demonic influence. It could be a case of untrained discernment. It could be a matter of immaturity. There are many possibilities. My core belief on the issue is that Jesus can overcome anything. I have yet to see someone acting out in their bi-polar disorder and submitted to Jesus Christ at the same time.
Friday, January 29, 2010
Leno vs. O'brien
Dear Victorious,
What do you make of the recent NBC flap with Jay Leno and Conan O'Brien? Is there a theological angle to this?
Sven T. - Lynn, MA
Dear Sven,
What I think is that both men are incredibly lucky to live lives that are so incredibly detached from reality. News reports put Leno's net worth north of $800 million. It's reported that he lives off of his stand-up comedy work and banks all of his TV income. By any measure, he's one of the wealthiest men in television. O'Brien worked at NBC for more than 20 years. No doubt he's been paid handsomely and is vested in retirement already. With a severance package of about $32 million, it's safe to say he never has to work again. Few people are as fortunate as these men. So whether you agree with how NBC handled things are not, remember where they both landed here - job or not. (For what it's worth, I don't think O'Brien is that funny ... and am more likely to watch Leno, though I thought his prime time show was lame.)
Is there a theological angle to this? Perhaps. The Bible tells us that we are not to regard rich people any differently, we are not to idolize anyone (or anything), that we are to focus on things that are excellent and worthy of praise (this isn't) and that we're to love others as we would want to be loved. If your home was destroyed in an earthquake and you had loved ones trapped beneath the rubble while you starved to death, or if your son was just killed in Iraq, or your daughter was serving in Afghanistan ... would you want the nation to be fretting about whether or not Leno and O'Brien have been treated right by NBC?
Honestly, if we were focused on Biblical principles and God's agenda ... we wouldn't be talking about Leno or O'Brien!
What do you make of the recent NBC flap with Jay Leno and Conan O'Brien? Is there a theological angle to this?
Sven T. - Lynn, MA
Dear Sven,
What I think is that both men are incredibly lucky to live lives that are so incredibly detached from reality. News reports put Leno's net worth north of $800 million. It's reported that he lives off of his stand-up comedy work and banks all of his TV income. By any measure, he's one of the wealthiest men in television. O'Brien worked at NBC for more than 20 years. No doubt he's been paid handsomely and is vested in retirement already. With a severance package of about $32 million, it's safe to say he never has to work again. Few people are as fortunate as these men. So whether you agree with how NBC handled things are not, remember where they both landed here - job or not. (For what it's worth, I don't think O'Brien is that funny ... and am more likely to watch Leno, though I thought his prime time show was lame.)
Is there a theological angle to this? Perhaps. The Bible tells us that we are not to regard rich people any differently, we are not to idolize anyone (or anything), that we are to focus on things that are excellent and worthy of praise (this isn't) and that we're to love others as we would want to be loved. If your home was destroyed in an earthquake and you had loved ones trapped beneath the rubble while you starved to death, or if your son was just killed in Iraq, or your daughter was serving in Afghanistan ... would you want the nation to be fretting about whether or not Leno and O'Brien have been treated right by NBC?
Honestly, if we were focused on Biblical principles and God's agenda ... we wouldn't be talking about Leno or O'Brien!
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Nancy Pelosi
Dear Victorious,
Do you think Nancy Pelosi is a godly woman? Does her leadership in Washington help or hurt our country?
James B. - Mamaroneck, NY
Dear James,
No. And no. I think she is full of herself and dangerous as a political leader. Unfortunately, I'm in the dubious position (as are you) of having to submit to her authority.
Do you think Nancy Pelosi is a godly woman? Does her leadership in Washington help or hurt our country?
James B. - Mamaroneck, NY
Dear James,
No. And no. I think she is full of herself and dangerous as a political leader. Unfortunately, I'm in the dubious position (as are you) of having to submit to her authority.
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Qualified Answers
Dear Victorious,
You seem to be pretty sure of yourself. What credentials do you have that qualify you to answer questions? Why should we listen to your answers?
David F. - Richardson, TX
Dear David,
If I seem sure of myself, it is only because I answer the questions prayerfully. In other words, I don't believe the answers are mine. They come through prayer and study of God's Word.
In terms of credentials, I am without. I have degrees in Biblical studies and Christian Counseling. But I acquired those through on-line coursework. So I'm not really trained and certainly wouldn't use those as evidence of my qualification for anything.
Finally, you shouldn't listen to my answers unless you think they have value.
You seem to be pretty sure of yourself. What credentials do you have that qualify you to answer questions? Why should we listen to your answers?
David F. - Richardson, TX
Dear David,
If I seem sure of myself, it is only because I answer the questions prayerfully. In other words, I don't believe the answers are mine. They come through prayer and study of God's Word.
In terms of credentials, I am without. I have degrees in Biblical studies and Christian Counseling. But I acquired those through on-line coursework. So I'm not really trained and certainly wouldn't use those as evidence of my qualification for anything.
Finally, you shouldn't listen to my answers unless you think they have value.
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Why Prayer
Dear Victorious,
Why should I keep praying for someone --- when I've prayed and prayed and God has not answered the prayer?
Marcella T. - St. Paul, MN
Dear Marcella,
Colossians 4:2 tells us, "Devote yourselves to prayer, being watchful and thankful." Our persistence in prayer is an expression of our faith that God answers our prayers. Faith cannot die if the answers come slowly ... or if they're not the answers we want. (Otherwise it wouldn't be faith!)
You say that God has not answered the prayer. There is much we could say about such a conclusion. There is an eternal truth at work here. It is that God answers prayer. Without exception. So if you think He has not, then you are mistaken. Perhaps God answered the prayer and you've missed His answer. Perhaps you've been praying for the wrong thing. Perhaps God answered the prayer and you don't like His answer. Or perhaps God has not answered the prayer yet.
Why should I keep praying for someone --- when I've prayed and prayed and God has not answered the prayer?
Marcella T. - St. Paul, MN
Dear Marcella,
Colossians 4:2 tells us, "Devote yourselves to prayer, being watchful and thankful." Our persistence in prayer is an expression of our faith that God answers our prayers. Faith cannot die if the answers come slowly ... or if they're not the answers we want. (Otherwise it wouldn't be faith!)
You say that God has not answered the prayer. There is much we could say about such a conclusion. There is an eternal truth at work here. It is that God answers prayer. Without exception. So if you think He has not, then you are mistaken. Perhaps God answered the prayer and you've missed His answer. Perhaps you've been praying for the wrong thing. Perhaps God answered the prayer and you don't like His answer. Or perhaps God has not answered the prayer yet.
Monday, January 25, 2010
True Christian
Dear Victorious,
What are the hallmarks of an effective Christian? We see so much written these days about hypocrites and all; but there's little to tell us what a true Christian really looks like.
Samantha R. - Flagstaff, AZ
Dear Samantha,
I think there is an easy answer that most of us would immediately think of. It would be someone who "walks the talk." I read somewhere recently where that comparison was drawn between someone who says Jesus versus someone who does Jesus.
The New Testament book of James gives us some pretty solid clarification on the issue. 1 Thessalonians 1:3 also gives us some more specific criteria. A true Christ-follower, who is submitted and surrendered to Christ, will exhibit:
1. Work produced by faith.
2. Labor produced by love.
3. Endurance inspired by hope.
Additionally, I believe a true Christ-follower will:
A. Turn towards God and the righteous things in life (from sin).
B. Serve God (instead of self).
C. Wait for the Son (expect God to deliver on His promises).
Now here's the problem ... the hallmarks of a true Christian are easily obscured by the infallible nature of the human that the true Christian inhabits. In other words, those virtues I just mentioned above? They'll co-exist with the sinful nature as it gradually dies out over the lifetime of that individual.
So the hallmarks of a true Christian are emerging in that person. They may not yet look like solid evidence.
What are the hallmarks of an effective Christian? We see so much written these days about hypocrites and all; but there's little to tell us what a true Christian really looks like.
Samantha R. - Flagstaff, AZ
Dear Samantha,
I think there is an easy answer that most of us would immediately think of. It would be someone who "walks the talk." I read somewhere recently where that comparison was drawn between someone who says Jesus versus someone who does Jesus.
The New Testament book of James gives us some pretty solid clarification on the issue. 1 Thessalonians 1:3 also gives us some more specific criteria. A true Christ-follower, who is submitted and surrendered to Christ, will exhibit:
1. Work produced by faith.
2. Labor produced by love.
3. Endurance inspired by hope.
Additionally, I believe a true Christ-follower will:
A. Turn towards God and the righteous things in life (from sin).
B. Serve God (instead of self).
C. Wait for the Son (expect God to deliver on His promises).
Now here's the problem ... the hallmarks of a true Christian are easily obscured by the infallible nature of the human that the true Christian inhabits. In other words, those virtues I just mentioned above? They'll co-exist with the sinful nature as it gradually dies out over the lifetime of that individual.
So the hallmarks of a true Christian are emerging in that person. They may not yet look like solid evidence.
Sunday, January 24, 2010
God's U.S.
Dear Victorious,
Do you think the United States is God's chosen nation? Are we the Israelites of the New Testament? What else could explain the success of our nation heretofore?
Missy S. - El Paso, TX
Dear Missy,
There's nothing Biblical to suggest that the U.S.A. could be God's chosen or favored nation, in the tradition of Israel. Certainly God must be given credit for our successes. The Bible says that apart from the Father we can do nothing (individually or collectively). But frankly, I would leave it there. The success of the U.S. continues to look less and less stunning as time goes on. Perhaps the greater question is to what (or whom) we will attribute our failures.
Do you think the United States is God's chosen nation? Are we the Israelites of the New Testament? What else could explain the success of our nation heretofore?
Missy S. - El Paso, TX
Dear Missy,
There's nothing Biblical to suggest that the U.S.A. could be God's chosen or favored nation, in the tradition of Israel. Certainly God must be given credit for our successes. The Bible says that apart from the Father we can do nothing (individually or collectively). But frankly, I would leave it there. The success of the U.S. continues to look less and less stunning as time goes on. Perhaps the greater question is to what (or whom) we will attribute our failures.
Saturday, January 23, 2010
Cultural Differences
Dear Victorious,
Our church bills itself as one that is "culturally relevant." The preacher talks often about how we need to consider the culture around us and engineer our ministries and programming "for the culture." Somehow this seems wrong to me. Doesn't giving culture differences so much attention create a risk of watering down the gospel truth?
Norman P. - Lakeland, FL
Dear Norman,
Yes, it does. Christians are called to stand against their culture. We are not to blend into our culture. Of course you preach in a language that the people can understand. But you have to allow the Holy Spirit to guide you even as you try and translate into another language. There is great danger in trying to accommodate cultural differences. Cultures can be wrong. Traditions can be wrong. And God's truth needs to prevail in the face of those wrongs.
Our church bills itself as one that is "culturally relevant." The preacher talks often about how we need to consider the culture around us and engineer our ministries and programming "for the culture." Somehow this seems wrong to me. Doesn't giving culture differences so much attention create a risk of watering down the gospel truth?
Norman P. - Lakeland, FL
Dear Norman,
Yes, it does. Christians are called to stand against their culture. We are not to blend into our culture. Of course you preach in a language that the people can understand. But you have to allow the Holy Spirit to guide you even as you try and translate into another language. There is great danger in trying to accommodate cultural differences. Cultures can be wrong. Traditions can be wrong. And God's truth needs to prevail in the face of those wrongs.
Friday, January 22, 2010
Celebrity Charity
Dear Victorious,
It seems to be a trend these days to have celebrities endorse charities, speak on their behalf or even start charities of their own. What do you make of this? Are "celebrity charities" more effective? How should Christians regard them?
Lee F. - Argyle, TX
Dear Lee,
I don't know if "celebrity charities" are more effective than any others. I suppose the definition of effectiveness might be relevant. All things considered, it appears that society does regard celebrity endorsements for charities worthwhile in at least on aspect --- fund raising. I've read in The Chronicle of Philanthropy (http://www.philanthropy.com/) that non-profits are better able to compete for charity dollars when they have celebrities endorsing them, speaking for them, etc. Of course the charities that are started by and/or named after the celebrities have that advantage as well.
If we look at the Clinton Foundation or the Lance Armstrong Foundation, they seem to be magnets for money. In fact, non-profit observers might say that charities like this seem to succeed at whatever they try to do. But I suppose the power is really in the infatuation that our culture has with celebrities. We somehow think that they are better people (than we are). And we seek to be affiliated with better people.
Few people donate money based on the effectiveness of the charity. Rather they donate money based on the cause(s) that the charity supposedly addresses and/or the brand of that specific charity. The president of the Red Cross, for example, spoke recently of how strong the "Red Cross brand" is in modern culture. So we're really giving to a perceived need or to a perceived addressing of that need. Neither needs to be verifiable in order for most people to give.
Are charities with celebrity affiliations more effective? I doubt it. Christians need to remember that the money in our possession belongs to God. We don't have any right to spend any of it without His express permission. So if we feel we should be giving money to a charity, that desire should be expressed in prayer first. God must direct our charity dollars as much as He does any of our other spending. And I'm pretty sure that God won't be influenced by celebrities. (Neither should we!)
It seems to be a trend these days to have celebrities endorse charities, speak on their behalf or even start charities of their own. What do you make of this? Are "celebrity charities" more effective? How should Christians regard them?
Lee F. - Argyle, TX
Dear Lee,
I don't know if "celebrity charities" are more effective than any others. I suppose the definition of effectiveness might be relevant. All things considered, it appears that society does regard celebrity endorsements for charities worthwhile in at least on aspect --- fund raising. I've read in The Chronicle of Philanthropy (http://www.philanthropy.com/) that non-profits are better able to compete for charity dollars when they have celebrities endorsing them, speaking for them, etc. Of course the charities that are started by and/or named after the celebrities have that advantage as well.
If we look at the Clinton Foundation or the Lance Armstrong Foundation, they seem to be magnets for money. In fact, non-profit observers might say that charities like this seem to succeed at whatever they try to do. But I suppose the power is really in the infatuation that our culture has with celebrities. We somehow think that they are better people (than we are). And we seek to be affiliated with better people.
Few people donate money based on the effectiveness of the charity. Rather they donate money based on the cause(s) that the charity supposedly addresses and/or the brand of that specific charity. The president of the Red Cross, for example, spoke recently of how strong the "Red Cross brand" is in modern culture. So we're really giving to a perceived need or to a perceived addressing of that need. Neither needs to be verifiable in order for most people to give.
Are charities with celebrity affiliations more effective? I doubt it. Christians need to remember that the money in our possession belongs to God. We don't have any right to spend any of it without His express permission. So if we feel we should be giving money to a charity, that desire should be expressed in prayer first. God must direct our charity dollars as much as He does any of our other spending. And I'm pretty sure that God won't be influenced by celebrities. (Neither should we!)
Thursday, January 21, 2010
Spanking Children
Dear Victorious,
I know the Bible says to "spare the rod and spoil the child." But this really seems outdated. Is it really necessary for Christian parents to spank their children?
Doreen G. - Tupelo, MS
Dear Doreen,
It may not be necessary for Christian parents to spank their children. It may be possible for them to lead their children to better conclusions and to correct their thinking and behavior without corporal punishment. However, when children are too young to reason with, a controlled (i.e., not done in anger) spanking may be the most practical way to get the child's attention to the subject and enforce the point (i.e., draw a boundary that is not to be crossed).
The rod mentioned in the Bible (Proverbs 22:15) is not necessarily a tool a tool for punishment or inflicting pain. Rather it was a tool for correction and discipline. It is structured living that keeps children from giving in to foolishness. It is strict parenting, good discipleship and wise counsel between parents and children.
I know the Bible says to "spare the rod and spoil the child." But this really seems outdated. Is it really necessary for Christian parents to spank their children?
Doreen G. - Tupelo, MS
Dear Doreen,
It may not be necessary for Christian parents to spank their children. It may be possible for them to lead their children to better conclusions and to correct their thinking and behavior without corporal punishment. However, when children are too young to reason with, a controlled (i.e., not done in anger) spanking may be the most practical way to get the child's attention to the subject and enforce the point (i.e., draw a boundary that is not to be crossed).
The rod mentioned in the Bible (Proverbs 22:15) is not necessarily a tool a tool for punishment or inflicting pain. Rather it was a tool for correction and discipline. It is structured living that keeps children from giving in to foolishness. It is strict parenting, good discipleship and wise counsel between parents and children.
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Political Advice
Dear Victorious,
If you could give our political leaders one piece of advice, what would you say to them?
Ronell A. - Medford, OR
Dear Ronell,
I would advise them to seek the Lord above all else. The Bible tells us that if we seek Him first, everything in life will work out. (Matthew 6:33) I believe that if our politicians would seek God first, above all else, that they would have the wisdom and discernment to make sound decisions. Moreover, they would have supernatural favor from the Creator ... and everything would work out.
Psalm 2:10-11 says that kings and rulers of the world should be wise, serving the Lord with fear and rejoicing with trembling. It describes the relationship that God wants to have with kings, queens, presidents, prime ministers, governors and other rulers of the world. Of course that will require their cooperation!
If you could give our political leaders one piece of advice, what would you say to them?
Ronell A. - Medford, OR
Dear Ronell,
I would advise them to seek the Lord above all else. The Bible tells us that if we seek Him first, everything in life will work out. (Matthew 6:33) I believe that if our politicians would seek God first, above all else, that they would have the wisdom and discernment to make sound decisions. Moreover, they would have supernatural favor from the Creator ... and everything would work out.
Psalm 2:10-11 says that kings and rulers of the world should be wise, serving the Lord with fear and rejoicing with trembling. It describes the relationship that God wants to have with kings, queens, presidents, prime ministers, governors and other rulers of the world. Of course that will require their cooperation!
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Punished Haiti?
Dear Victorious,
We've heard Pat Robertson and others say that the devastating earthquake in Haiti is God's punishment for their sins. Is this true?
Kyung C. - Vancouver, BC
Dear Kyung,
I don't think any of us can really know if natural disasters are God's punishment for sin. There are some important truths though that are worth remembering in situations like this.
First, it is the nature and character of God to punish sin with what humans consider devastating circumstances. Throughout the Old Testament God specifically punished sin by unleashing his wrath through wars and natural disasters. In every case, God's intent was to eradicate the evil from a people group and to save a righteous "remnant" that He would then prosper. So it is possible that God punishes sin today.
Second, bad things do happen to innocent people. We live in a fallen world, beset by calamities. the Bible says that all of nature groans until Christ returns. That simply means that things aren't right in the world. Weather patterns and other matters are included. Adam and Eve lived in a perfect world. But after their sin, the world was no longer perfect. So things happen, and they don't need a particular reason to happen.
Third, when people sin, there are always consequences. It doesn't matter what the sin is or who the people are. These are natural consequences. They aren't God's specific punishment. In fact, if there were no God at all, these natural consequences for these poor choices would still be there.
Finally, it has become popular to blame calamity and travesty on someone. Religious leaders have blamed AIDS on homosexuals. They blamed the tsunami on Islam. Now they're blaming the earthquake on voodooism. While these are certainly things that could inspire the wrath of God (based on what we know of His nature and character), it is not helpful to try and assign blame. It would be much more helpful to respond in love, leading the sinners to repentance - turning them from the sinful ways towards righteousness in Jesus Christ.
My suggestion is that we pray for the Haitians. Let's pray for the aid workers. And let's ask God to use this calamity to draw the Haitian people to Himself, giving them a fresh sense of who God is.
We've heard Pat Robertson and others say that the devastating earthquake in Haiti is God's punishment for their sins. Is this true?
Kyung C. - Vancouver, BC
Dear Kyung,
I don't think any of us can really know if natural disasters are God's punishment for sin. There are some important truths though that are worth remembering in situations like this.
First, it is the nature and character of God to punish sin with what humans consider devastating circumstances. Throughout the Old Testament God specifically punished sin by unleashing his wrath through wars and natural disasters. In every case, God's intent was to eradicate the evil from a people group and to save a righteous "remnant" that He would then prosper. So it is possible that God punishes sin today.
Second, bad things do happen to innocent people. We live in a fallen world, beset by calamities. the Bible says that all of nature groans until Christ returns. That simply means that things aren't right in the world. Weather patterns and other matters are included. Adam and Eve lived in a perfect world. But after their sin, the world was no longer perfect. So things happen, and they don't need a particular reason to happen.
Third, when people sin, there are always consequences. It doesn't matter what the sin is or who the people are. These are natural consequences. They aren't God's specific punishment. In fact, if there were no God at all, these natural consequences for these poor choices would still be there.
Finally, it has become popular to blame calamity and travesty on someone. Religious leaders have blamed AIDS on homosexuals. They blamed the tsunami on Islam. Now they're blaming the earthquake on voodooism. While these are certainly things that could inspire the wrath of God (based on what we know of His nature and character), it is not helpful to try and assign blame. It would be much more helpful to respond in love, leading the sinners to repentance - turning them from the sinful ways towards righteousness in Jesus Christ.
My suggestion is that we pray for the Haitians. Let's pray for the aid workers. And let's ask God to use this calamity to draw the Haitian people to Himself, giving them a fresh sense of who God is.
Monday, January 18, 2010
4th Generation?
Dear Victorious,
Settle and argument for me. My father-in-law (who thinks he knows everything) insists that God punishes sin to the 4th generation. He says it's in the Bible. So, for example, he believes that my great grandchildren will be punished for the sins I've committed. I say God wouldn't do that; it just wouldn't be fair. Who's right here?
Donald T. - Birmingham, AL
Dear Donald,
Neither of you are right. What your father-in-law cites is in the Bible - but he is misunderstanding its meaning. I can think of two Scripture verses where it specifically mentions punishment of sin "to the third and fourth generation." The first is in Numbers 14:18. The second is in Deuteronomy 5:9-10.
When Moses makes this reference in Numbers 14:18, he is describing the impact of sin. We can understand this to be the natural consequences of sin. So if a parent is sinful and rebellious, the children will suffer in that they will not learn how to live right. As a result, their children will suffer similarly. Ignorance, rebellion, unbelief and other maladies are systemically passed on from generation to generation. God is not saying he intends to punish three or four generations for one sin. He is saying that He will allow the natural consequences of our sin to play themselves out - from generation to generation.
The reference in Deuteronomy 5:9-10 is even more clear. God says these consequences will pass from generation to generation "of those who hate me." This means that unless the generation turns to God and disrupts the pattern of disobedience and rebellion of their parents or other ancestors --- they will suffer the natural consequences of those sins. However, God adds that if the next generation turns to Him in obedience then He will respond to them in love (with forgiveness and mercy).
You and your father-in-law should not be ignorant about who God is or how He works. Sin affects many people besides the sinner who commits it. Some of those people aren't even born yet when the sin is committed. This is the reality of how sin works ... and it's the most important point of these Scripture references.
However, God is love and He offers forgiveness and mercy to all who will turn to them. So, for example, if you think you are suffering the consequences of your parents' (or other ancestors) sin, then you can turn to God with a repentant heart and expect His forgiveness and mercy.
Some people make intercessory prayer for those forefathers (and mothers) who may have sinned ... acknowledging those sins before God and asking Him to forgive those sins. While you might argue that this isn't really necessary (since you didn't commit the sin), it does demonstrate to God the fact that you have a repentant heart and don't own the sin that was committed. In other words, it demonstrates that you agree with God about the fact that the sin was wrong.
Settle and argument for me. My father-in-law (who thinks he knows everything) insists that God punishes sin to the 4th generation. He says it's in the Bible. So, for example, he believes that my great grandchildren will be punished for the sins I've committed. I say God wouldn't do that; it just wouldn't be fair. Who's right here?
Donald T. - Birmingham, AL
Dear Donald,
Neither of you are right. What your father-in-law cites is in the Bible - but he is misunderstanding its meaning. I can think of two Scripture verses where it specifically mentions punishment of sin "to the third and fourth generation." The first is in Numbers 14:18. The second is in Deuteronomy 5:9-10.
When Moses makes this reference in Numbers 14:18, he is describing the impact of sin. We can understand this to be the natural consequences of sin. So if a parent is sinful and rebellious, the children will suffer in that they will not learn how to live right. As a result, their children will suffer similarly. Ignorance, rebellion, unbelief and other maladies are systemically passed on from generation to generation. God is not saying he intends to punish three or four generations for one sin. He is saying that He will allow the natural consequences of our sin to play themselves out - from generation to generation.
The reference in Deuteronomy 5:9-10 is even more clear. God says these consequences will pass from generation to generation "of those who hate me." This means that unless the generation turns to God and disrupts the pattern of disobedience and rebellion of their parents or other ancestors --- they will suffer the natural consequences of those sins. However, God adds that if the next generation turns to Him in obedience then He will respond to them in love (with forgiveness and mercy).
You and your father-in-law should not be ignorant about who God is or how He works. Sin affects many people besides the sinner who commits it. Some of those people aren't even born yet when the sin is committed. This is the reality of how sin works ... and it's the most important point of these Scripture references.
However, God is love and He offers forgiveness and mercy to all who will turn to them. So, for example, if you think you are suffering the consequences of your parents' (or other ancestors) sin, then you can turn to God with a repentant heart and expect His forgiveness and mercy.
Some people make intercessory prayer for those forefathers (and mothers) who may have sinned ... acknowledging those sins before God and asking Him to forgive those sins. While you might argue that this isn't really necessary (since you didn't commit the sin), it does demonstrate to God the fact that you have a repentant heart and don't own the sin that was committed. In other words, it demonstrates that you agree with God about the fact that the sin was wrong.
Sunday, January 17, 2010
Popular Christians
Dear Victorious,
Do you think it's possible for true Christians to be popular without compromising their faith? It always seems that the most popular people are the ones that look like the hypocrites.
Eve S. - Schaumburg, IL
Dear Eve,
I think we need to agree on the definition of popular. The short answer to your question is yes. But the definition of popular is probably going to be the big if here. If people are truly Christlike, then they will definitely be attractive to others. Look how many people followed Jesus when He walked the earth in human form. He was as godly as anyone could be, and yet thousands wanted to be with him, hear him, sit in his audience, serve him, etc.
The fact that not everyone likes someone does not mean they are not popular. Let's not look for popularity. Rather let us look for someone who is so attractive in their character and authenticity that others are drawn to them. That is when popular and virtuous will meet.
Do you think it's possible for true Christians to be popular without compromising their faith? It always seems that the most popular people are the ones that look like the hypocrites.
Eve S. - Schaumburg, IL
Dear Eve,
I think we need to agree on the definition of popular. The short answer to your question is yes. But the definition of popular is probably going to be the big if here. If people are truly Christlike, then they will definitely be attractive to others. Look how many people followed Jesus when He walked the earth in human form. He was as godly as anyone could be, and yet thousands wanted to be with him, hear him, sit in his audience, serve him, etc.
The fact that not everyone likes someone does not mean they are not popular. Let's not look for popularity. Rather let us look for someone who is so attractive in their character and authenticity that others are drawn to them. That is when popular and virtuous will meet.
Saturday, January 16, 2010
Palin Presidency
Dear Victorious,
Do you think Sarah Palin would make a good president for the United States? Why or why not?
Mark H. - Tiffin, OH
Dear Mark,
To be honest, I haven't really thought that much about it. Perhaps the reason is I don't think she's serious about going after that job. Frankly she can probably do more in terms of amassing, wealth and influence if she just peddles books, goes on the speaking circuit and becomes a media figure. Consider characters like George Stephanopoulos who shift from politics to private sector and do quite well. Similarly, Sarah may find that the private sector will reward her much better and not be as demanding as public service.
But if she were to run, do I think she'd make a good president? I think she'd work with honesty and integrity. But I don't think she has the wisdom or life experience to deliver what is really needed. Quite honestly the challenges of leading our country are today greater than they have probably ever been. So it would seem to me that we need to find the wisest people who have the greatest critical thinking abilities and a laser-sharp focus on the most relevant issues. I find none of those attributes in Sarah Palin right now.
Do you think Sarah Palin would make a good president for the United States? Why or why not?
Mark H. - Tiffin, OH
Dear Mark,
To be honest, I haven't really thought that much about it. Perhaps the reason is I don't think she's serious about going after that job. Frankly she can probably do more in terms of amassing, wealth and influence if she just peddles books, goes on the speaking circuit and becomes a media figure. Consider characters like George Stephanopoulos who shift from politics to private sector and do quite well. Similarly, Sarah may find that the private sector will reward her much better and not be as demanding as public service.
But if she were to run, do I think she'd make a good president? I think she'd work with honesty and integrity. But I don't think she has the wisdom or life experience to deliver what is really needed. Quite honestly the challenges of leading our country are today greater than they have probably ever been. So it would seem to me that we need to find the wisest people who have the greatest critical thinking abilities and a laser-sharp focus on the most relevant issues. I find none of those attributes in Sarah Palin right now.
Friday, January 15, 2010
Retreats & Conferences
Dear Victorious,
I have attended many Christian retreats and conferences, and always find them to be an enjoyable break. But I wonder if they theologically sound. It seems that many of them are charged with emotion, excitement and euphoria that fades quickly afterwards. Would we be better off not attending such events?
Daryl N. - Sparks, NV
Dear Daryl,
Sometimes we can only get a clear view of reality when we step back from our daily lives and see the patterns of the world around us in comparison with truth. (It's the old adage of "seeing the forest for the trees.") Christian retreats and conferences, like days of prayer and fasting, can help us quiet the noise of our jobs and other commitments, as well as the media that we are constantly exposed to. they can help bring us back into intense focus on God and help us to have fresh encounters with His Spirit. The real question to ask is whether these events glorify God, are based on His truth and whether they renew us to serve Him.
If you are questioning the value of Christian events, ask God to show you His will in that regard. Pray before each one that you sin up for. Ask ... and wait ... for God's permission to go. Let Him be the judge of whether or not each event has value for you in your walk with the Lord.
I have attended many Christian retreats and conferences, and always find them to be an enjoyable break. But I wonder if they theologically sound. It seems that many of them are charged with emotion, excitement and euphoria that fades quickly afterwards. Would we be better off not attending such events?
Daryl N. - Sparks, NV
Dear Daryl,
Sometimes we can only get a clear view of reality when we step back from our daily lives and see the patterns of the world around us in comparison with truth. (It's the old adage of "seeing the forest for the trees.") Christian retreats and conferences, like days of prayer and fasting, can help us quiet the noise of our jobs and other commitments, as well as the media that we are constantly exposed to. they can help bring us back into intense focus on God and help us to have fresh encounters with His Spirit. The real question to ask is whether these events glorify God, are based on His truth and whether they renew us to serve Him.
If you are questioning the value of Christian events, ask God to show you His will in that regard. Pray before each one that you sin up for. Ask ... and wait ... for God's permission to go. Let Him be the judge of whether or not each event has value for you in your walk with the Lord.
Thursday, January 14, 2010
Final Judgements
Dear Victorious,
I know you've said we're not to get caught up in the imagery of the book of Revelation. But sometimes I can't resist! Seriously, I am confused about the "trumpet judgements" and the "bowl judgements." How can I tell them apart and what is their respective significance?
Melanie E. - Katy, TX
Dear Melanie,
The trumpet judgements still give unbelievers an opportunity to repent. but the bowl judgements do not. These judgements are complete and finish off the destruction of all mankind which does not belong to God. Trumpet judgements are warnings. Bowl judgements are what we were being warned about - final judgement and destruction of all that is not redeemed by Jesus Christ.
I know you've said we're not to get caught up in the imagery of the book of Revelation. But sometimes I can't resist! Seriously, I am confused about the "trumpet judgements" and the "bowl judgements." How can I tell them apart and what is their respective significance?
Melanie E. - Katy, TX
Dear Melanie,
The trumpet judgements still give unbelievers an opportunity to repent. but the bowl judgements do not. These judgements are complete and finish off the destruction of all mankind which does not belong to God. Trumpet judgements are warnings. Bowl judgements are what we were being warned about - final judgement and destruction of all that is not redeemed by Jesus Christ.
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Loss of Salvation
Dear Victorious,
I know that the Bible teaches we can not lose our salvation. But Scripture seems to contradict itself in places. For example, in Ezekiel 18:24 and 26, it appears that righteous people can lose their salvation by sinning and not repenting. Doesn't this mean that our salvation isn't as secure as the preachers would have us believe?
Luther A. - Dayton, OH
Dear Luther,
No, that's not what it means. The first thing you need to understand is that Scripture never contradicts itself. It's impossible. So if it looks that way to you, then you must conclude that there is something which you're missing or something that you don't understand. Never, ever conclude that Scripture contradicts itself. If you give in to that lie, then the truth of the whole Bible will be meaningless to you!
What is being talked about in Ezekiel 18 and what is being talked about elsewhere in the Bible in this regard really amounts to whether one was ever saved or had their salvation in the first place. Notice that in the same chapter of Ezekiel it speaks of people who do evil and then repent, and get life. But the verses you reference are where (seemingly) righteous people do evil and don't repent, and get death. This is very different than losing one's salvation. The question is whether one had salvation in the first place.
1 John 3:9 tells us that no one who is born of God (i.e., a true Christian) will continue to sin or go on sinning. That doesn't mean they will never sin. It means they can not sin without being grieved by it and being moved to repent of it. For sure, people are righteous and saved will sin. But the evidence of their salvation will be found in their repentance for that sin. Said differently, the things that grieve God will also grieve the one in whom God lives.
So Luther, the question is not whether one can lose their salvation. Rather the question is whether one ever had their salvation in the first place. Just because someone "got saved" in human terms does not mean that they received the Holy Spirit, and that He dwells in them now. Those things only happen when one has had a true change of heart and yielded himself (or herself) to God in a genuine way.
I know that the Bible teaches we can not lose our salvation. But Scripture seems to contradict itself in places. For example, in Ezekiel 18:24 and 26, it appears that righteous people can lose their salvation by sinning and not repenting. Doesn't this mean that our salvation isn't as secure as the preachers would have us believe?
Luther A. - Dayton, OH
Dear Luther,
No, that's not what it means. The first thing you need to understand is that Scripture never contradicts itself. It's impossible. So if it looks that way to you, then you must conclude that there is something which you're missing or something that you don't understand. Never, ever conclude that Scripture contradicts itself. If you give in to that lie, then the truth of the whole Bible will be meaningless to you!
What is being talked about in Ezekiel 18 and what is being talked about elsewhere in the Bible in this regard really amounts to whether one was ever saved or had their salvation in the first place. Notice that in the same chapter of Ezekiel it speaks of people who do evil and then repent, and get life. But the verses you reference are where (seemingly) righteous people do evil and don't repent, and get death. This is very different than losing one's salvation. The question is whether one had salvation in the first place.
1 John 3:9 tells us that no one who is born of God (i.e., a true Christian) will continue to sin or go on sinning. That doesn't mean they will never sin. It means they can not sin without being grieved by it and being moved to repent of it. For sure, people are righteous and saved will sin. But the evidence of their salvation will be found in their repentance for that sin. Said differently, the things that grieve God will also grieve the one in whom God lives.
So Luther, the question is not whether one can lose their salvation. Rather the question is whether one ever had their salvation in the first place. Just because someone "got saved" in human terms does not mean that they received the Holy Spirit, and that He dwells in them now. Those things only happen when one has had a true change of heart and yielded himself (or herself) to God in a genuine way.
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
False Teachers
Dear Victorious,
I suspect that a preacher at our church is a false teacher (in the Biblical sense). How can I be sure?
Percy I. - Carbondale, IL
Dear Percy,
I'm not sure what you mean by someone being a false teacher "in the Biblical sense." But if I read my Bible's warnings about false teachers, and examine the credentials for true teachers, there are three criteria that come to mind about false teachers:
1. Their teachings do not confirm what Scripture already says.
Preaching or teaching should have an element of redundancy in that nothing should be preached or taught which isn't already stated in Scripture.
2. They don't proclaim that Jesus is God.
Preaching or teaching should only help to point people to God. It should narrowly focus people on the gospel of Jesus Christ ... and not distract them with false gods like leadership, prosperity or service.
3. Their own life style is not consistent with Biblical morality.
The teacher must be living a life that is testament to what they teach. In other words, the teacher must excel at "walking the talk."
Having made these three points though, be cautious about this third point. Preachers and teachers are human. Thus they are infallible, hopeless sinners in desperate need of a Savior. You'll have to give them grace for their own sins and not judge them. So, for example, don't expect them to be sinless. Rather expect them to be repentant about their sin.
I suspect that a preacher at our church is a false teacher (in the Biblical sense). How can I be sure?
Percy I. - Carbondale, IL
Dear Percy,
I'm not sure what you mean by someone being a false teacher "in the Biblical sense." But if I read my Bible's warnings about false teachers, and examine the credentials for true teachers, there are three criteria that come to mind about false teachers:
1. Their teachings do not confirm what Scripture already says.
Preaching or teaching should have an element of redundancy in that nothing should be preached or taught which isn't already stated in Scripture.
2. They don't proclaim that Jesus is God.
Preaching or teaching should only help to point people to God. It should narrowly focus people on the gospel of Jesus Christ ... and not distract them with false gods like leadership, prosperity or service.
3. Their own life style is not consistent with Biblical morality.
The teacher must be living a life that is testament to what they teach. In other words, the teacher must excel at "walking the talk."
Having made these three points though, be cautious about this third point. Preachers and teachers are human. Thus they are infallible, hopeless sinners in desperate need of a Savior. You'll have to give them grace for their own sins and not judge them. So, for example, don't expect them to be sinless. Rather expect them to be repentant about their sin.
Monday, January 11, 2010
Ministry Alone?
Dear Victorious,
I am active in my church and serve faithfully in many respects. The problem is that I often see ministry needs which need to be addressed ... and end up being the only one who is willing to address them! I'll start a ministry endeavor and then find it is too hard to do by myself. But I have never been very good at recruiting others to join me in such ministry work. How do I get people to get more engaged?
Tiffany M. - Raleigh, NC
Dear Tiffany,
When God truly calls us to do something, most likely He is calling others in the same way. He never meant for us to be sole operators in ministry. Rather God wants us to function in the community of other believers whom He has called similarly. So if you seem to be the only one called to do something, I'd ask a couple of questions.
First, is it possible that this perceived "calling" is really just a manifestation of your own desire to be busy, produce fruit, etc.? Often people mistake their own thinking for God's. The way to be sure of that is to look for affirmation of whatever it is you think God has called you to do. Do other spiritually mature people agree that you're being called in this way? Is there a real need that should be filled? Do you see God working in this way without you?
Second, is it possible that the people around you are actually called but they aren't listening? In other words, are you simply experiencing the consequences of someone else's sin. You in fact may be called to do something, as are others. But perhaps you're the only one who is obedient to the call. If so, you may well find yourself serving alone ... ministering alone. In that case, God is with you and that will have to do. Do you trust God to equip and empower you to steer the course? Are you willing to obey Him even if others do not?
I am active in my church and serve faithfully in many respects. The problem is that I often see ministry needs which need to be addressed ... and end up being the only one who is willing to address them! I'll start a ministry endeavor and then find it is too hard to do by myself. But I have never been very good at recruiting others to join me in such ministry work. How do I get people to get more engaged?
Tiffany M. - Raleigh, NC
Dear Tiffany,
When God truly calls us to do something, most likely He is calling others in the same way. He never meant for us to be sole operators in ministry. Rather God wants us to function in the community of other believers whom He has called similarly. So if you seem to be the only one called to do something, I'd ask a couple of questions.
First, is it possible that this perceived "calling" is really just a manifestation of your own desire to be busy, produce fruit, etc.? Often people mistake their own thinking for God's. The way to be sure of that is to look for affirmation of whatever it is you think God has called you to do. Do other spiritually mature people agree that you're being called in this way? Is there a real need that should be filled? Do you see God working in this way without you?
Second, is it possible that the people around you are actually called but they aren't listening? In other words, are you simply experiencing the consequences of someone else's sin. You in fact may be called to do something, as are others. But perhaps you're the only one who is obedient to the call. If so, you may well find yourself serving alone ... ministering alone. In that case, God is with you and that will have to do. Do you trust God to equip and empower you to steer the course? Are you willing to obey Him even if others do not?
Sunday, January 10, 2010
Stubborn
Dear Victor,
My wife says that I am stubborn and that it is wrecking our marriage. I come from a long line of German people and we've always considered stubbornness a virtue. After all it's about being intentional, single-minded and confident. What can I do to lead my wife to a better conclusion about my stubbornness?
Ralph Y. - Germantown, MD
Dear Ralph,
I'm afraid you're barking up the wrong tree with me on this one. Blaming your stubbornness on your German heritage is a cop out. It's buying into the lie that our culture trumps virtue. (It never has.)
Stubbornness is rooted in self centeredness. Of course those who are stubborn have great difficulty seeing that. It's hard for them to imagine that their stubbornness could ever be their fault. So it would take a brave man to first admit that he is stubborn (which is not a virtue) and then to honestly seek the truth about why he is that way.
Perhaps you've already come to the conclusion that you are stubborn. Now you just have to admit that it's a character defect and start treating it that way.
My wife says that I am stubborn and that it is wrecking our marriage. I come from a long line of German people and we've always considered stubbornness a virtue. After all it's about being intentional, single-minded and confident. What can I do to lead my wife to a better conclusion about my stubbornness?
Ralph Y. - Germantown, MD
Dear Ralph,
I'm afraid you're barking up the wrong tree with me on this one. Blaming your stubbornness on your German heritage is a cop out. It's buying into the lie that our culture trumps virtue. (It never has.)
Stubbornness is rooted in self centeredness. Of course those who are stubborn have great difficulty seeing that. It's hard for them to imagine that their stubbornness could ever be their fault. So it would take a brave man to first admit that he is stubborn (which is not a virtue) and then to honestly seek the truth about why he is that way.
Perhaps you've already come to the conclusion that you are stubborn. Now you just have to admit that it's a character defect and start treating it that way.
Saturday, January 9, 2010
Helping Government
Dear Victorious,
You seem to rant about the national debt quite a bit. What you don't seem to grasp is that the common citizen is really pretty helpless. Do you honestly believe there is anything any of us can do individually that could really help?
Marva B. - Scottsdale, AZ
Dear Marva,
Yes, I do.
We could vote. A shocking number of people fail to vote in most elections, especially for our local officials and delegates to the federal government. Most people don't know who their Senators or Congressmen are. We stick our heads in the sand and assume that it's out of our hands. It would be responsible for us to actively research and know the candidates, vote for the ones who are qualified and ethical, and then follow their activity to ensure that they're voting our values. When they screw up, we can communicate with them --- letting them know that we don't approve of pork, poor legislation or other irresponsible representation. In other words, we can hold accountable those whom we elect. This of course would be inconvenient and require sacrifice on our part.
We could pay. It is estimated that as many as 43-49% of all U.S. citizens will pay no federal income taxes because of the way the tax code is written. They either earn too little to pay or they have sufficient deductions reduce their tax liability to zero (or less). Common sense would tell you that this isn't a sustainable economic model. All of those people are benefiting from the services of the federal government. So we could stop taking tax deductions and credits that we're entitled to legally --- in an effort to voluntarily help the government fiscally. We could stop taking government benefits like social security, disability, Medicare and Medicaid, welfare, food stamps and other entitlements unless we absolutely need them and have no other way to support and sustain ourselves. Finally, we could freely give money to the government. People will give millions to their alma mater because they're proud of it and want to help it be stronger and even more credible. Why couldn't we view the federal government the same way. We could name the U.S. government in our wills, specifically designating the funds to be used for retiring national debt. This of course would be inconvenient and require sacrifice on our part.
I am not optimistic that the American culture will embrace any of these things soon.
You seem to rant about the national debt quite a bit. What you don't seem to grasp is that the common citizen is really pretty helpless. Do you honestly believe there is anything any of us can do individually that could really help?
Marva B. - Scottsdale, AZ
Dear Marva,
Yes, I do.
We could vote. A shocking number of people fail to vote in most elections, especially for our local officials and delegates to the federal government. Most people don't know who their Senators or Congressmen are. We stick our heads in the sand and assume that it's out of our hands. It would be responsible for us to actively research and know the candidates, vote for the ones who are qualified and ethical, and then follow their activity to ensure that they're voting our values. When they screw up, we can communicate with them --- letting them know that we don't approve of pork, poor legislation or other irresponsible representation. In other words, we can hold accountable those whom we elect. This of course would be inconvenient and require sacrifice on our part.
We could pay. It is estimated that as many as 43-49% of all U.S. citizens will pay no federal income taxes because of the way the tax code is written. They either earn too little to pay or they have sufficient deductions reduce their tax liability to zero (or less). Common sense would tell you that this isn't a sustainable economic model. All of those people are benefiting from the services of the federal government. So we could stop taking tax deductions and credits that we're entitled to legally --- in an effort to voluntarily help the government fiscally. We could stop taking government benefits like social security, disability, Medicare and Medicaid, welfare, food stamps and other entitlements unless we absolutely need them and have no other way to support and sustain ourselves. Finally, we could freely give money to the government. People will give millions to their alma mater because they're proud of it and want to help it be stronger and even more credible. Why couldn't we view the federal government the same way. We could name the U.S. government in our wills, specifically designating the funds to be used for retiring national debt. This of course would be inconvenient and require sacrifice on our part.
I am not optimistic that the American culture will embrace any of these things soon.
Friday, January 8, 2010
Faithful To God
Dear Victorious,
What does is mean for someone to be "faithful to God?"
Dee Ann L. - Kissimmee, FL
Dear Dee Ann,
Faithfulness to God is really an acute sensitivity to ... and sorrow over sin. Any sin. It could be my sin, it could be your sin, it could be our sin, or it could even be the sins of other people. All sin should grieve those who are truly faithful to God. It's really an alignment with God's will and then sin and sorry for any departure from His will.
The Bible puts it this way in Ezekiel 9:4-5. If you go to http://www.biblegateway.com/ you can look it up in various translations. I specifically like the Amplified Bible and The Message translations.
Recognize that any attempt to broaden the definition of faithfulness is pretty futile --- as sin is already a pretty broad definition. It includes anything that is not God's will, including not doing His will when it is known, not following Him, etc. Truly faithful people are just as grieved by and sorry for that as they are for the more blatant sins mankind commits.
What does is mean for someone to be "faithful to God?"
Dee Ann L. - Kissimmee, FL
Dear Dee Ann,
Faithfulness to God is really an acute sensitivity to ... and sorrow over sin. Any sin. It could be my sin, it could be your sin, it could be our sin, or it could even be the sins of other people. All sin should grieve those who are truly faithful to God. It's really an alignment with God's will and then sin and sorry for any departure from His will.
The Bible puts it this way in Ezekiel 9:4-5. If you go to http://www.biblegateway.com/ you can look it up in various translations. I specifically like the Amplified Bible and The Message translations.
Recognize that any attempt to broaden the definition of faithfulness is pretty futile --- as sin is already a pretty broad definition. It includes anything that is not God's will, including not doing His will when it is known, not following Him, etc. Truly faithful people are just as grieved by and sorry for that as they are for the more blatant sins mankind commits.
Thursday, January 7, 2010
Interpreting Revelation
Dear Victorious,
I am reading the book of Revelation in the New Testament and am getting very frustrated. It's just plain confusing. The imagery is like reading something out of Harry Potter (or worse)! Seriously, animals with multiple heads, covered in eyeballs, with wings on all sides and that sort of thing. How on earth can we understand or interpret this kind of stuff? How can I get to what really matters in this book of the Bible?
Pedro C. - Gallup, NM
Dear Pedro,
For starters, you can stop focusing on the great imagery. Those images are representative of something much larger. For example, something covered in eyes might be illustrating the concept of all-knowing. There are good commentaries available that will help you understand the meaning of the imagery. But without them, you can still ask yourself what could be represented in such things. And when you try to answer that question, consider the context that Revelation is written in. It's the End Times, where the final battle between God and all things evil occurs. So the imagery is likely to represent some aspect of God and/or His judgment. Or it could represent some aspect of evil that is being (or about to be) judged.
Don't get caught up in this imagery either. If you can't understand it or can't imagine something that it could represent, just move on. Chalk it up to representing something that you can't (yet) understand. God will help you understand all that you need to understand. The book of Revelation is a book of judgment for those who are not in Christ Jesus. And it is a book of hope for those who are. If you understand that much, you're better off than most people!
I am reading the book of Revelation in the New Testament and am getting very frustrated. It's just plain confusing. The imagery is like reading something out of Harry Potter (or worse)! Seriously, animals with multiple heads, covered in eyeballs, with wings on all sides and that sort of thing. How on earth can we understand or interpret this kind of stuff? How can I get to what really matters in this book of the Bible?
Pedro C. - Gallup, NM
Dear Pedro,
For starters, you can stop focusing on the great imagery. Those images are representative of something much larger. For example, something covered in eyes might be illustrating the concept of all-knowing. There are good commentaries available that will help you understand the meaning of the imagery. But without them, you can still ask yourself what could be represented in such things. And when you try to answer that question, consider the context that Revelation is written in. It's the End Times, where the final battle between God and all things evil occurs. So the imagery is likely to represent some aspect of God and/or His judgment. Or it could represent some aspect of evil that is being (or about to be) judged.
Don't get caught up in this imagery either. If you can't understand it or can't imagine something that it could represent, just move on. Chalk it up to representing something that you can't (yet) understand. God will help you understand all that you need to understand. The book of Revelation is a book of judgment for those who are not in Christ Jesus. And it is a book of hope for those who are. If you understand that much, you're better off than most people!
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
When God Is Mean
Dear Victorious,
I have a friend whom I've been witnessing to and she continually brings up incidents in the Bible where she says that God is mean. For example, she'll use the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, or the great flood, or turning Lot's wife into a pillar of salt. Even the death of Jesus on the cross is something she says was God's will and is proof that God is mean. She says she "can't believe in a God who would do such things to innocent people." What can I say to such a claim?
Gloria O. - Spokane, WA
Dear Gloria,
There probably isn't much that you can say. Perhaps the better thing for you to do is get on your knees and ask God how He would like you to respond to your friend. After all, your responsibility ends when you are obediently witnessing to your friend (or anyone else God puts in your life and calls you to witness to). Their response is definitely not your responsibility.
What you need to realize is that when someone says they can't believe in a God who would do this or not do that ... what they're really saying is that they refuse to believe in the God who is. Instead, they choose to believe in a God that they conceive of in their own minds. Another way of saying it is that they refuse to believe in a God who won't meet their expectations. And you may have to let them.
What you can do is continue to pray for your friend. Continue to look for opportunities to love on her. Ask God in prayer to soften her heart, to reveal Himself to her, and to open her eyes to the truth. And then you let God be God.
I have a friend whom I've been witnessing to and she continually brings up incidents in the Bible where she says that God is mean. For example, she'll use the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, or the great flood, or turning Lot's wife into a pillar of salt. Even the death of Jesus on the cross is something she says was God's will and is proof that God is mean. She says she "can't believe in a God who would do such things to innocent people." What can I say to such a claim?
Gloria O. - Spokane, WA
Dear Gloria,
There probably isn't much that you can say. Perhaps the better thing for you to do is get on your knees and ask God how He would like you to respond to your friend. After all, your responsibility ends when you are obediently witnessing to your friend (or anyone else God puts in your life and calls you to witness to). Their response is definitely not your responsibility.
What you need to realize is that when someone says they can't believe in a God who would do this or not do that ... what they're really saying is that they refuse to believe in the God who is. Instead, they choose to believe in a God that they conceive of in their own minds. Another way of saying it is that they refuse to believe in a God who won't meet their expectations. And you may have to let them.
What you can do is continue to pray for your friend. Continue to look for opportunities to love on her. Ask God in prayer to soften her heart, to reveal Himself to her, and to open her eyes to the truth. And then you let God be God.
Tuesday, January 5, 2010
Promise Keepers
Dear Victorious,
Several years ago, I remember going to stadium events hosted by Promise Keepers. It was a vibrant men's ministry that seemed to offer hope and renewal for men. To be honest though, life went right back to normal. Years later I don't think my life looks much different than it would have if I hadn't gone to the Promise Keepers events. So what really happened back there? Was I deceived? Was I duped? Did I just get an emotional high ... that couldn't last? Was Promise Keepers just a sham?
Louis D. - Paducah, KY
Dear Louis,
No, I don't think you were duped. And no, I don't think Promise Keepers was just a sham. They're a legitimate Christian ministry as far as most people are concerned. And that would include the government which grants them tax-exempt status and of course the donors who fund them, as well as the men who pay to attend their conferences and buy their resources.
Promise Keepers, in my personal opinion, missed an enormous opportunity to be a "horizontal church" partnering with local churches. They started strong and had an amazing impact, especially at getting the spiritual attention of men worldwide. However, their leadership fumbled and they lost their leadership position. Without that leadership, they lost the influence and were not able to provide the ongoing discipleship that men need.
Sadly, Promise Keepers is not unlike many other ministries that people are passionate about ... at first. Then they tend to lose their luster for the masses and their field of ministry becomes much more narrow. Promise Keepers is alive and well today. (Visit them at http://www.promisekeepers.org/.) They are still a conference factory, a resource center and do ministry on a day-to-day basis.
Perhaps a good question for you to answer might be what you would have wanted to have happened after your early Promise Keepers experiences. Did you really expect Promise Keepers to change your life or transform you? In other words, what were your expectations for Promise Keepers ... and were those really appropriate expectations?
Several years ago, I remember going to stadium events hosted by Promise Keepers. It was a vibrant men's ministry that seemed to offer hope and renewal for men. To be honest though, life went right back to normal. Years later I don't think my life looks much different than it would have if I hadn't gone to the Promise Keepers events. So what really happened back there? Was I deceived? Was I duped? Did I just get an emotional high ... that couldn't last? Was Promise Keepers just a sham?
Louis D. - Paducah, KY
Dear Louis,
No, I don't think you were duped. And no, I don't think Promise Keepers was just a sham. They're a legitimate Christian ministry as far as most people are concerned. And that would include the government which grants them tax-exempt status and of course the donors who fund them, as well as the men who pay to attend their conferences and buy their resources.
Promise Keepers, in my personal opinion, missed an enormous opportunity to be a "horizontal church" partnering with local churches. They started strong and had an amazing impact, especially at getting the spiritual attention of men worldwide. However, their leadership fumbled and they lost their leadership position. Without that leadership, they lost the influence and were not able to provide the ongoing discipleship that men need.
Sadly, Promise Keepers is not unlike many other ministries that people are passionate about ... at first. Then they tend to lose their luster for the masses and their field of ministry becomes much more narrow. Promise Keepers is alive and well today. (Visit them at http://www.promisekeepers.org/.) They are still a conference factory, a resource center and do ministry on a day-to-day basis.
Perhaps a good question for you to answer might be what you would have wanted to have happened after your early Promise Keepers experiences. Did you really expect Promise Keepers to change your life or transform you? In other words, what were your expectations for Promise Keepers ... and were those really appropriate expectations?
Monday, January 4, 2010
God's Glory
Dear Victorious,
I've read and heard, including in the Bible, references to "God's glory." What exactly is "the glory of the Lord," or "God's glory?" How would you define it?
Sonjalese M. - Palm Springs, CA
Dear Sonjalese,
It's really just a manifestation (i.e., visible display) of God's character --- His ultimate power, His transcendence (i.e., ability to transcend time and space) and His moral perfection. Put another way, it is God revealing Himself to mankind.
Keep in mind here that mankind is not able to comprehend all of God's glory. So that which is revealed is only that which we are capable of grasping. The truth is none of us can really know the extent or the fullness of God's glory (at least while we're here on earth in human form).
I've read and heard, including in the Bible, references to "God's glory." What exactly is "the glory of the Lord," or "God's glory?" How would you define it?
Sonjalese M. - Palm Springs, CA
Dear Sonjalese,
It's really just a manifestation (i.e., visible display) of God's character --- His ultimate power, His transcendence (i.e., ability to transcend time and space) and His moral perfection. Put another way, it is God revealing Himself to mankind.
Keep in mind here that mankind is not able to comprehend all of God's glory. So that which is revealed is only that which we are capable of grasping. The truth is none of us can really know the extent or the fullness of God's glory (at least while we're here on earth in human form).
Sunday, January 3, 2010
Prayer Requests
Dear Victorious,
When someone asks me to pray for them, I am sometimes in a quandary as to what to pray. I mean, what they want may not be what I think is best - or what I think God would want for them. So do I tell them I can't pray for that? What else can I do? It feels insincere to agree to a prayer request and then not pray it.
Marcel J. - Brampton, ON
Dear Marcel,
Yes, it would feel insincere to agree to a prayer request and then not pray it. It would also be sinful for you to do that! So how should you pray when you don't agree with what's been desired? It's simple. Just pray for God's perfect will to be done in the situation.
So, for example, your friend John asks you to pray that he get this job - but you think he's not qualified. You might say something like, "Yes, John, I will pray for you about that."
Then you pray and ask God to work His perfect will in John's life. You ask God to give John this job, if it is His will that John have this job. And if it's not God's will that John have this job, then ask God to help John accept that and find peace with his circumstances, learning to lean on God's perfect provision in his life. You ask God to give John wisdom and discernment about where to focus his job-search efforts. And you ask God to give John patience and endurance through the job hunt process.
When someone asks me to pray for them, I am sometimes in a quandary as to what to pray. I mean, what they want may not be what I think is best - or what I think God would want for them. So do I tell them I can't pray for that? What else can I do? It feels insincere to agree to a prayer request and then not pray it.
Marcel J. - Brampton, ON
Dear Marcel,
Yes, it would feel insincere to agree to a prayer request and then not pray it. It would also be sinful for you to do that! So how should you pray when you don't agree with what's been desired? It's simple. Just pray for God's perfect will to be done in the situation.
So, for example, your friend John asks you to pray that he get this job - but you think he's not qualified. You might say something like, "Yes, John, I will pray for you about that."
Then you pray and ask God to work His perfect will in John's life. You ask God to give John this job, if it is His will that John have this job. And if it's not God's will that John have this job, then ask God to help John accept that and find peace with his circumstances, learning to lean on God's perfect provision in his life. You ask God to give John wisdom and discernment about where to focus his job-search efforts. And you ask God to give John patience and endurance through the job hunt process.
Saturday, January 2, 2010
Dead Celebrities?
Dear Victor,
Do you think there's any possibility that celebrities such as Elvis or Michael Jackson are actually still alive? Is it possible that their deaths were just a hoax?
Marv C. - Colfax, NC
Dear Marv,
No, I don't. There is no incident in modern history of such hoax's prevailing. Even when someone has tried to fake their deaths (for insurance or other purposes) they are usually caught and we read about it in the news.
Now, I have a question for you. Why, as a follower and servant of Jesus Christ, would you care about such nonsense?
Do you think there's any possibility that celebrities such as Elvis or Michael Jackson are actually still alive? Is it possible that their deaths were just a hoax?
Marv C. - Colfax, NC
Dear Marv,
No, I don't. There is no incident in modern history of such hoax's prevailing. Even when someone has tried to fake their deaths (for insurance or other purposes) they are usually caught and we read about it in the news.
Now, I have a question for you. Why, as a follower and servant of Jesus Christ, would you care about such nonsense?
Friday, January 1, 2010
Predictions
Dear Victorious,
I saw a guy on TV the other night discussing his predictions for the New Year. They ranged from the marriages of celebrities to politics and the economy. Is this really appropriate? I mean, aren't Christians supposed to stay away from fortune-telling?
Dean S. - Longview, TX
Dear Dean,
Yes, Christians are supposed to stay away from fortune-telling. The Bible says we are not to regard the supernatural except that which is related to the Holy Spirit Himself. We are not to be entertained by the supernatural in any way either. I doubt very much whether the guy you saw on TV was really billing himself as a professional who has supernatural powers to predict the future. Even if he was, it's not likely that he was on TV for that purpose. More than likely, the TV show or station had him on more for entertainment value than anything.
Humans have an innate desire to know what's going to happen in the future. We don't like unanswered questions. And we seem to have a core belief that knowing something about the future will enable us to do something about the future. So if anyone credible seems to have any insight about the future, we tend to stop and listen to them. (After all, you listened to this guy on TV!) While this may be fun or interesting, it really holds little value.
The only way we can truly know what to do in the New Year is by talking to our heavenly Father and asking Him to guide our steps. If we'll let Him, God will direct our thinking, our decisions and our reactions as things unfold in our futures. But God rarely lets us see or know more than we need to see or know. In other words, it is proven by God's nature and character, as well as our (i.e., His followers) experience with him over the centuries --- that God doesn't show us much of the future except on a "need-to-know" basis. So to put it bluntly, true Christ-followers usually have to learn to live with ambiguity - not knowing what's going to happen this year - but trusting that God has prepared us to deal with whatever happens.
I saw a guy on TV the other night discussing his predictions for the New Year. They ranged from the marriages of celebrities to politics and the economy. Is this really appropriate? I mean, aren't Christians supposed to stay away from fortune-telling?
Dean S. - Longview, TX
Dear Dean,
Yes, Christians are supposed to stay away from fortune-telling. The Bible says we are not to regard the supernatural except that which is related to the Holy Spirit Himself. We are not to be entertained by the supernatural in any way either. I doubt very much whether the guy you saw on TV was really billing himself as a professional who has supernatural powers to predict the future. Even if he was, it's not likely that he was on TV for that purpose. More than likely, the TV show or station had him on more for entertainment value than anything.
Humans have an innate desire to know what's going to happen in the future. We don't like unanswered questions. And we seem to have a core belief that knowing something about the future will enable us to do something about the future. So if anyone credible seems to have any insight about the future, we tend to stop and listen to them. (After all, you listened to this guy on TV!) While this may be fun or interesting, it really holds little value.
The only way we can truly know what to do in the New Year is by talking to our heavenly Father and asking Him to guide our steps. If we'll let Him, God will direct our thinking, our decisions and our reactions as things unfold in our futures. But God rarely lets us see or know more than we need to see or know. In other words, it is proven by God's nature and character, as well as our (i.e., His followers) experience with him over the centuries --- that God doesn't show us much of the future except on a "need-to-know" basis. So to put it bluntly, true Christ-followers usually have to learn to live with ambiguity - not knowing what's going to happen this year - but trusting that God has prepared us to deal with whatever happens.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
